User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 20

Archive 15

←

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Estação Júlio Prestes 2018 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 12:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Can you elaborate please? It already has guided PC (flat sea horizon, vertical in the middle of the building, left vertical of the the information sign), which parts are wrong? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC) the right side is leaning out --Poco a poco 15:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC) Thanks, perspective redone, how does it look now? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 09:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, altough sharpness is so-so. --C messier 19:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Duque de Caxias 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 07:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paróquia São Sebastião, Cachoeira Paulista 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 06:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croome Court 2016 177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island Game Farm 2024 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island Game Farm 2024 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 06:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 10:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Moroder 10:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 10:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 644 - Sub Fun Cinco entering Marina San Miguel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo, Brazil 2019 176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 13:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qality -- Spurzem 10:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engenho Central do Bracuhy 2018 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engenho Central do Bracuhy 2018 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engenho Central do Bracuhy 2018 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engenho Central do Bracuhy 2018 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engenho Central do Bracuhy 2018 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 18:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Five Million

Moin Mike Peel, the Infobox is now in over five million articles, I beleave it is a good story, thanks for starting it. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 16:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 16:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 16:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now --Berthold Werner 16:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 10:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 13:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 11:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

some cache issue?

Category:University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee alumni has a population for WD for 3 cats, though most populate in Category:Alumni of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Cannot see an issue in the respective data, and I cannot get the cache to update University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (Q1755318) and Category:University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee alumni (Q9653073). What am I missing?  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: I can't obviously spot the issue, can you repost this at Template talk:Wikidata Infobox so others also see it? I'm mostly out for a long weekend. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Old photos (MP) 2003 050.jpg

File:Old photos (MP) 2003 050.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Old photos (MP) 069.jpg

File:Old photos (MP) 069.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grendelkhan 07:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grendelkhan 07:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Generally good quality. However, the eastern side (?) with the inscription is a little too bright. -- Spurzem 15:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please include geolocation for this image. --Grendelkhan 04:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC) Coordinates added. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grendelkhan 07:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please include geolocation for this image. --Grendelkhan 04:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC) Coordinates added. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grendelkhan 07:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 498 - Still Hunt (Central Park sculpture).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a better title, otherwise good. --C messier 20:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC) File renamed, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island Game Farm 2024 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 16:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support This one is borderline quality (a little noisy), but ok for me. --Красный 23:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 09:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 16:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 07:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 07:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 07:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 07:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 07:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 13:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too much noise (check the glass facade) --MB-one 11:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC) Noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Much better --MB-one 07:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 12:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island Game Farm 2024 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 12:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

File:At Tallinn 2024 502.jpg

File:At Tallinn 2024 502.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 10:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Impressive quality. --Grendelkhan 23:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 08:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice. --Alexander-93 08:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island Game Farm 2024 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 19:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 10:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 16:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grendelkhan 09:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island Game Farm 2024 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Morocco 2023 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Very good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice bird and good quality -- Spurzem 10:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 21:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2023 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy in the lower darker parts --MB-one 16:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC) Noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Infobox gives wrong state

Hi. The bot added an infobox to Category:Buddy Bolden's house, First Street, New Orleans. Mostly good, except that it's located in New Orleans in the state of Louisiana, USA. The box states "Location New Orleans, Southern Holocene Meander Belts, Mississippi" - Mississippi is a different state (and I don't see relevance of "Southern Holocene Meander Belts"). I tried editing the box at Wikidata, without luck in fixing this. Tips on how this can be fixed? Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: Thanks for catching this, it's an odd one! It turns out that this edit is what was needed to fix it, which is rather obscure, sorry. Does it look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks! Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - nice composition, however IMO left and top crop could have been better --Michielverbeek 05:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted, see sea level at the left --Poco a poco 18:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC) Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Красный 06:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the composition is pretty casual. --Moroder 18:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Cropped, does that composition look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 00:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Yess. --Moroder 17:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The statue is hanging too crookedly for a QI. Can this still be fixed? -- Spurzem 09:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC) Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 01:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC) * Good now -- Spurzem 08:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think the background is busy and distorded. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC) I've cropped it to minimise the background, does that look better? I don't think I can do more with the perspective, since straightening the background more distorts the front of the car. Thanks. Mike Peel 01:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC) Good quality. --ReneeWrites 19:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:At Tallinn 2024 356.jpg

And also:

• File:At Tallinn 2024 357.jpg
• File:At Tallinn 2024 358.jpg
• File:At Tallinn 2024 359.jpg
• File:At Tallinn 2024 360.jpg
• File:At Tallinn 2024 361.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 18:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1753 - Binter Canarias aircraft (EC-MPI) at Tenerife North Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support File name could be more specific, picture is ok. --Plozessor 03:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2023 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment May be too much noise. --Sebring12Hrs 09:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC) Noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)  Support QI imo now. --ArildV 11:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments too noise background --Ezarate 19:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC) Noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)  Support QI now imo. --ArildV 11:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 13:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 13:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 07:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Table Mountain, Cape Town (MP) 2018 194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Tail is slightly out of focus, but good enough IMO. --Benjism89 19:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 13:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. You might want to crop the top part of this picture, though. --Benjism89 05:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tight crop, part of the roof is missing. --ArildV 11:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC) Crop redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok. --ArildV 14:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 377 - Berlin Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2024 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The outer parts are a bit unsharp. But the overall quality is good. --Augustgeyler 07:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 22:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness and composition is fine but the sculpture have very dark shadows. It might be artistic, but for QI its underexposed. --ArildV 07:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC) Shadows brightened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodega El Grifo 2022 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Almería 2022 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lovell Telescope 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting detail, good quality

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 20:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is quite low here, but might be OK. I suggest removing chromatic aberration at the second left window and reduce noise-reduction slightly. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC) Tweaked as requested, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 21:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Macclesfield 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 14:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments slightly tilted to the right? --Georgfotoart 17:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC) Rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 21:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI imo. --ArildV 08:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 15:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you crop a bit more on the left (to get rid of the glass)? --Poco a poco 07:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC) Cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Better, although I'd have gone further. --Poco a poco 12:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 12:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Category

Hola, piBot, podrías crear la página de Antonio Jesús Roldán Muñoz en Commons, conectar la ID de Wikipedia, al igual que hiciste en Inmaculada Sánchez Zara. Gracias. Un Saludo Uregapedia (talk) 10:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Category:Antonio Jesús Roldán Muñoz ya esta bueno? Gracias. Mike Peel (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:20, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 19:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think you should crop the object at the bottom-left corner, and increase exposure of the bottom-right piece of land. --Benjism89 10:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC) Thanks for the suggestions, cropped and brightened, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Thanks, good quality now. Benjism89 19:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would suggest cropping out the left and right ends, as they are out of focus. I doesn't bother me that flowers that are behind the main subjects are out of focus as they constitute a background, but I'm less confortable with foreground out of focus flowers. --Benjism89 20:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Cropped, does that look better? I'm not sure about cropping further as I think that adds depth to the photo. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)  Support I think it's better now. Cropping makes the two sharp, in focus flowers more central in the picture. --Benjism89 19:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museu de Arte Contemporânea da Universidade de São Paulo 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo but a small cw tilt? --ArildV 19:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC) I've redone the perspective (now guided rather than automatic), hopefully that's also fixed the tilt? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Thank you. Nice photo! --ArildV 06:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Gran Canaria 2021 1138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'd have cropped a bit on the left to get rid of disturbing Elements on top and Bottom but acceptable, I guess --Poco a poco 08:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 11:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:51, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 11:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University of Sao Paulo campus 2016 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:43, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University of Sao Paulo campus 2016 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments lots of pavement and sky --Georgfotoart 17:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC) I've cropped it a bit, but the point of the open park is the pavement and the sky, so I don't want to crop too much more. How does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:24, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments lots of sky --Georgfotoart 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Cropped, does that look better? The sky and water are a key part of the composition, though, so I don't want to crop much more. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 14:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI imo. --ArildV 12:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Could be cropped a bit more tightly on both sides so the dark shadow on the left and the person on the right are not in the picture (with a top/bottom crop to match). ReneeWrites 09:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC) Cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)  Support It looks great, thank you :) ReneeWrites 19:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)  Comment. I don't like the unnaturally color of the grass. For me it would not be a QI. -- Spurzem 14:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC) WB tweaked, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC) There is little difference -- Spurzem 15:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museu de Arte Contemporânea da Universidade de São Paulo 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMHO good enough for QI. Maybe oversharpened? --C messier 21:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 365.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bad left crop imo. --ArildV 07:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Thank you, ok now. --ArildV 10:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't understand the composition. Why not move to the right and avoid the tree? --ArildV 12:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC) For the contrast of the tree against the concrete, and to minimise the EV charger blocking things. Thanks. Mike Peel 15:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok. --ArildV 10:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Pi bot

@Mike Peel: would you take a look at this? Don't know hw to handle it. Thank you so muc for your time. Lotje (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

@Lotje: this was anon vandalism, not Pi bot. Pi bot just added back the infobox. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Lotje (talk) 02:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments too much road and sky --Georgfotoart 12:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC) Cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 09:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 09:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition: I would crop the left part, especially the lower left corner. --2015 Michael 2015 18:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC) Cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Now I like it :-) --2015 Michael 2015 14:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs PC --Tagooty 01:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Perspective redone, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark and blurry (probably fixable). I'd also crop the wall on the left side away. --Plozessor 04:38, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Reworked, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Really good now! --Plozessor 10:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I suggest cropping out the car on the right. --Augustgeyler 12:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC) Cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)  Support It looks good.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 22:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 039 - Balliol College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but need perspective/tilt correction. Left building learning out. --ArildV 08:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC) Perspective corrected, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Thank you. --ArildV 10:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:21, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hughenden Manor 2024 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:26, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK imo. --ArildV 08:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The white fender on the bottom right is abit annoying. Itherwise good --MB-one 21:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC) White fender removed with generative AI, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Looks good to me now --MB-one 13:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Looks good to me now --MB-one 13:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)