User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1432 - El muñeco de nieve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Cholsey and Wallingford Railway 2024 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Swindon Steam Railway Museum 2024 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reassign category to Wikidata item
Hello, @Mike Peel:
Is it possible to reassign the Wikidata element (Q127959530) to Category:Codex Vigilanus?
I have created the Category:Chronicon Albeldense which has its own Wikidata (Q17533465)
Not everything contained in the Codex Vigilanus is Chronicon Albeldense. It is not advisable to confuse the whole with a part.
Thanks a lot. Jdayanz (talk) 09:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Jdayanz: [1] & [2] were the edits you were looking for. ;-) It may take a while for the infoboxes to update due to caching (try making some null edits or purging the page), but hopefully that looks better? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, @Mike Peel Jdayanz (talk) 07:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Swindon Steam Railway Museum 2024 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Uses of Wikidata Infobox with maps has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Enhancing999 (talk) 09:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Human category wikidata infobox
How many categories are about a human and don't have a WD infobox? Andres Ollino (talk) 12:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Andres Ollino: I don't know. You'd have to look through the categories without an infobox and figure out if they were about a human or not. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a category there stores all that are without? Andres Ollino (talk) 05:07, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Cholsey and Wallingford Railway 2024 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gawthorpe Hall 2016 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Swindon Steam Railway Museum 2024 178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2024 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wikimedia Summit 2024 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 576.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Swindon Steam Railway Museum 2024 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
|
File:PIA05248 label.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Krd 01:21, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hughenden Manor 2024 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png){kind=small}
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
The image File:Gawthorpe Hall 2016 038.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gawthorpe Hall 2016 038.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Swindon Steam Railway Museum 2024 252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At London 2024 338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Around Paraty, Brazil 2018 278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
_2016_1.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 149 New Montgomery roof view (Wikimedia Foundation) 2016 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_2016_2.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 149 New Montgomery roof view (Wikimedia Foundation) 2016 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_2016_4.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 149 New Montgomery roof view (Wikimedia Foundation) 2016 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester War Memorial 2018 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Jan Michalski (Q70587255) & Jan Michalski (Q125552582)
Morning, mornig. Jan Michalski (Q70587255) & Jan Michalski (Q125552582) is the same person. 77.0.39.226 05:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Done Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Jan Michalski (Q96202510) and Jan Michalski (Q129948431)
Another ... Jan Michalski (Q96202510) and Jan Michalski (Q129948431) Polish theologian, historiographer and rector of the Jagiellonian University... it's the same person. Regards 77.0.39.226 06:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Jan Michalski (Q107977377) and Jan Michalski (Q107977391)
The next .... Jan Michalski (Q107977377) and Jan Michalski (Q107977391) Polish educator... it's the same person. Regards 77.0.39.226 06:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Another Jan Michalski (Q120758799) and Jan Michalski (Q107977356)
Another next ... Jan Michalski (Q120758799) and Jan Michalski (Q107977356) Polish bookseller, publisher died in Frankfurt/Main (16th mar 1945) ... it's the same person. Regards 77.0.39.226 07:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 064 - Teasel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories without infoboxes
Commons:Report Special:UncategorizedCategories has a few categories that have Wikidata items, but don't seem to have gotten infoboxes. Also, so no automatic categorization happen. Samples: d:Q16873296, d:Q126934314, d:Q126201672. Enhancing999 (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Enhancing999: I need to check further, but I think this is being caused by a Commons database bug, they aren't being returned as candidates by this script/database query. Likely worth reporting on Phabricator. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 05:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I purged all categories on the list, but these are still on it. An alternative could be to query just for these categories and have your bot processes them.
- The discussion about the update of the report is at Bots/Work_requests. Enhancing999 (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Does the SQL you are using assume these categories have parent categories? So the ones on the list are systematically skipped. Enhancing999 (talk) 09:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's a good question, I don't know the answer. It might, since it has a dependency on categorylinks - but it would be a question for someone who knows the database structure better. I can't remember who wrote this SQL query for me now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can try to rewrite it to remove the dependency. Enhancing999 (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- If you can, that would be great - or an additional query to catch edge cases like these would also be easy to fit into the bot process. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sure:
- Quarry:query/85833 (1075 rows, as current query but excluding 10000 category redirects)
- Quarry:query/85768 (proposed new query, 1167 rows, with 92 additional rows)
- Enhancing999 (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Do you plan to update it? Otherwise I can do the backlog on the list myself. For testing purposes, I think it would be better if the bot did it.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)- Implemented, running in parallel for now, let's see how that goes tomorrow. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. It seems to have worked, as none of the categories on Commons:Report Special:UncategorizedCategories now have items.
- In the meantime, I came up with Commons:Report UncategorizedCategories with infobox (those with infobox, but no item). Some have your bot as last user as it normalizes the infobox call. A few might have been disconnected from Wikidata, but most haven't. I'm still trying to figure out how to optimize the report.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 08:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)- I wonder if there is a way that the bot could skip normalizing pages with empty infoboxes? This would avoid it appears as "last user" on Commons:Report UncategorizedCategories with infobox for edits like [3]. Alternatively, I guess I could try to query the revisions without the bot's edits.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 12:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)- Not easily, it's part of the workflow to make sure that duplicate infoboxes aren't added to the categories. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a specific need for Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no item? Somehow it seems suboptimal to exclude categories from Special:UncategorizedCategories merely because of an empty infobox.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)- Yes, those are all cases where having a Wikidata item has been requested by a Commons user by their inclusion of the template, and should probably be created if it doesn't already exist. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- A thing I noticed when updating Commons:Report UncategorizedCategories with infobox is that when users work logically, they first create the category at Commons with the empty infobox and then create the item or connect it to an item, meaning that all new creations end up there and need to be purge first. Possibly others on Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no item have this issue. A different problem are empty categories there. It seems many users just let them linger when they create a better or correctly named category.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- A thing I noticed when updating Commons:Report UncategorizedCategories with infobox is that when users work logically, they first create the category at Commons with the empty infobox and then create the item or connect it to an item, meaning that all new creations end up there and need to be purge first. Possibly others on Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no item have this issue. A different problem are empty categories there. It seems many users just let them linger when they create a better or correctly named category.
- Yes, those are all cases where having a Wikidata item has been requested by a Commons user by their inclusion of the template, and should probably be created if it doesn't already exist. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a specific need for Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no item? Somehow it seems suboptimal to exclude categories from Special:UncategorizedCategories merely because of an empty infobox.
- Not easily, it's part of the workflow to make sure that duplicate infoboxes aren't added to the categories. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I wonder if there is a way that the bot could skip normalizing pages with empty infoboxes? This would avoid it appears as "last user" on Commons:Report UncategorizedCategories with infobox for edits like [3]. Alternatively, I guess I could try to query the revisions without the bot's edits.
- Implemented, running in parallel for now, let's see how that goes tomorrow. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Do you plan to update it? Otherwise I can do the backlog on the list myself. For testing purposes, I think it would be better if the bot did it.
- Sure:
- If you can, that would be great - or an additional query to catch edge cases like these would also be easy to fit into the bot process. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can try to rewrite it to remove the dependency. Enhancing999 (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's a good question, I don't know the answer. It might, since it has a dependency on categorylinks - but it would be a question for someone who knows the database structure better. I can't remember who wrote this SQL query for me now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Does the SQL you are using assume these categories have parent categories? So the ones on the list are systematically skipped. Enhancing999 (talk) 09:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Danuta Rożynek (Q117089745) & Danuta Rożynek (Q111285884)
Danuta Rożynek (Q117089745) & Danuta Rożynek (Q111285884) Polish physician ... it's the same person. Regards 77.8.170.157 05:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument to Mario Cermenati, Wikimania 2016, MP 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument to Mario Cermenati, Wikimania 2016, MP 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paróquia São Sebastião, Cachoeira Paulista 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Question
Hello Mike Peel, how are you?
I've recently done a batch upload request for a Brazilian database of electoral portraits and while talking with DaxServer, he said that the biographical data from divulgacandcontas.tse.jus.br (example) is relevant for Wikidata. Would the Pi bot be able to help with this? As an example: collecting data like "name, profession, date/place of birth..." for Wikidata; linking the images from Category:Files from Portal de Dados Abertos do TSE with WD; and categorizing the images with the candidate and the election name (while creating or linking to the necessary WD pages). The database also has links for CSV and TXT files of the results, if they are useful for Wikidata, but I'm not sure how to work with them.
In the Commons:Batch uploading/Files from Portal de Dados Abertos do TSE I have explained more in deep, and I've also raised this question at Wikidata project talk. Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 22:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey! @Mike Peel told me about this thread, and @Erick Soares3 feel free to contact me if you would like support to work on this project. Wiki Movimento Brasil members and staff are able to collaborate. Let us know how we should proceed. -- Joalpe (talk) 16:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Joalpe I will start a thread on your discussion page! Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 16:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Obrigado todos. :) I think this is much more in WMB's scope than something Pi bot can help with. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Joalpe I will start a thread on your discussion page! Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 16:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Avalon, Morro Bay 2015 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Avalon, Morro Bay 2015 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Morro Bay 2015 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Morro Bay 2015 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
"Wikidata Infobox|wikidata=Q" instead of "Wikidata Infobox|qid=Q"
Just noticed this is more frequent than I thought: [4]
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- this should sort it out, I've been running it with my account for testing, but will get Pi bot to run through the rest in the next few days. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Enhancing999: All cleaned up. Pi bot should keep the number of recurrances down. There were a bunch of cases with QIDs to redirects, the wrong item, or just with typos, but that sort of thing will always happen when people try to manually define QIDs... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Good. There are a few more at [5]
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 21:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)- Oof, a few more being a thousand... Will point them out to Pi bot. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Some had a trying ")" that borked it: like John_Philip_Sousa_III. Happens when pasting from Wikidata. Maybe add a \)? to the regex.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)- Hopefully fixed with this change. I've reverted edits to categories linking to Template:Wikidata Infobox), the bot should fix them properly soon. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Some had a trying ")" that borked it: like John_Philip_Sousa_III. Happens when pasting from Wikidata. Maybe add a \)? to the regex.
- Oof, a few more being a thousand... Will point them out to Pi bot. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Good. There are a few more at [5]
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brazilian Decimetric Array 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brazilian Decimetric Array 2017 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2019 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2019 244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At London 2024 342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Cato (town), New York vs. Cato (village), New York
Your Wikidata Infobox for the Village of Cato, New York, was incorrectly added to the Town of Cato, New York. I tried to correct this by moving the infobox to the appropriate category, but I accidentally blanked it. --DanTD (talk) 11:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- @DanTD: Corrected on Wikidata [6] [7] - infoboxes in both categories should work now, but you may need to purge the page caches. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Infoboxes
Hello Mike,
in the last few weeks I have connected Commonscats to (new or existing) wikidata objects, while so far no Infobox has been added by Pi bot in most cases.
For example, in subcategories of
- Category:Female sportspeople by country by sport
- Category:Male sportspeople by country by sport
- Category:World War memorials in Germany
- Category:Men of Germany by name
- Category:Men of Austria by name
- Category:Women of Austria by name
- Category:Women of Germany by name
- Category:Musical groups from Austria
- Category:Musical groups from Germany
- Category:Streets in Munich by name
- Category:Streets in Vienna by name
- Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Brandenburg with known ID
- Category:Churches in Germany
there should be Commonscats which are connected to a Wikidata object, but do not yet have an infobox. Maybe Pi bot could be started manually recursivly for these categories to add missing infoboxes.
Also see User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 10 - Infoboxes
Thanks a lot! M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I guess these would be some of them: https://petscan.wmcloud.org/?psid=29194852 (subcats of Category:Streets in Munich by name with Wikidata item, but no infobox).
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 00:00, 2 September 2024 (UTC) - PetScan knows Q117155434:
- I try search for d:Q117155434 at quarry:history/85965/925666/898247 but it didn't return anything.
- Compare with d:Q30047942: quarry:history/85965/925664/898245.
- page properties for Category:Naupliastraße_(München) still has "unexpectedUnconnectedPage": quarry:history/85965/925666/898247.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)- It will be a few days before I can set Pi bot running through these, as I'm currently traveling. Will be interesting to see if Enhancing999 can spot why they aren't showing up through the database query. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 05:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- It seems to be a bug in the database. phab: might get you a more detailed explanation.
- After doing an initial run of Commons:Report UncategorizedCategories with infobox, I purged all items on the list and this cleared maybe 200 of 4500. At this proportion 5% of 9,500,000 unconnected categories might have an item, or at least the ones that haven't been edited since being connected.
- Maybe there is way to query the Wikidata database with a different SQL (I will try to, but it might take a couple of days).
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 09:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)- This query could work for some of them: it finds categories that use a single Wikidata item, but don't have any templates.
- When first run, it found 4647 categories in ca. 15 minutes. It included 120 streets in Munich.
- If a bot purges them, tomorrow the categories would likely get infoboxes.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 13:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)- I've scheduled pi bot to try running that query tomorrow, and then running through the output to try to add the infobox to them. Let's see if that works, otherwise I should be able to try other things later this week. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if it's an adequate replacement for the candidates list, I'd just run "touch.py" on these categories.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)- Pi bot is currently running the old and the new candidates list queries, but hasn't been adding infoboxes from the old candidate list at all, the new one has covered all of those cases. So I've swapped the old query out with this test query, while leaving the new candidate list query in place to cover the usual deployment. If it works, then the bot will go through the test query categories to see if it can add infoboxes to them directly, avoiding the need to 'touch' them. Those edits will be marked by "(legacy)" at the start of the edit summary due to the way I had it set up before. It's an approach that lets me point pi bot directly towards these new categories, before I'm back on the same local network as it for more detailed changes. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- It seems to have worked: the query is finding quite a few categories that Pi bot is now adding the infobox to. See the "(legacy)" edits at Special:Contributions/Pi_bot. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nice. Also, none ended up in the infoboxes not having items category: [8].
- Maybe the query can be improved, to get more than these 4647 categories. The PetScan-query for Munich above still shows seven categories, including some that only have template {{De}}.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 12:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)- Curiously, Pi bot ran through a bunch more today, again marked with "(legacy)" in the edit summaries. So it seems worthwhile keeping this query running, at least for a while. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- These seem to be relatively recent items: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q130000881&action=history .
- I'm sure there is more. I need to take some time to come up with a better query.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)- quarry:query/86096 finds another 800, but takes 1.5 hours to run. Most are fairly recently added links at Wikidata (sample). Also, quarry lost the results, so I have to re-run it.
- Anyways, do you want to include them in the bot? Shall I just do purge edit on the result? Would you want to file a phab ticket so someone investigates why this happens?
- A few variations on the query might give more.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)- I think you should report these issues on phabricator. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- "(legacy)" still seems to work. The table it's based on might get updated before the other. The query we are using (quarry:query/86040) could probably be shortened to quarry:history/86196/928151/900660 (uses of more than 1 item seem to be mostly renames or mergers, another bug).
- Both show categories where the item is no longer associated with it.[9] The bot seems to skip those.
- My attempts to improve further tend to end in OperationalErrors. Eventually, I might get it to work.
- BTW, would you link the item in the bot's edit summary (sample: "current Wikidata ID is Q5")?
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 13:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)- Changes made to link to the QIDs and update the query, let's see how those go. I've also changed from "(legacy)" to "(query 2)" since it looks like this one will be around for a while. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at some of the higher qids in the "(query 2)"-additions of today, there does seem to be a stack of otherwise unconnected categories: [10] (2 weeks delay).
- One would need to find another way to match the links in Wikidata with Commons. A way could be to make the SQL table of Wikidata pointing to Commons also available in the Commons database. An alternative, could be to ask WMF to periodically resync the Commons table of page properties with Wikidata.
- A solution for @M2k~dewiki could be to purge the Commons category after creating an item at Wikidata. (He could run a script once a day).
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Changes made to link to the QIDs and update the query, let's see how those go. I've also changed from "(legacy)" to "(query 2)" since it looks like this one will be around for a while. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Curiously, Pi bot ran through a bunch more today, again marked with "(legacy)" in the edit summaries. So it seems worthwhile keeping this query running, at least for a while. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if it's an adequate replacement for the candidates list, I'd just run "touch.py" on these categories.
- I've scheduled pi bot to try running that query tomorrow, and then running through the output to try to add the infobox to them. Let's see if that works, otherwise I should be able to try other things later this week. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Moin Mike, Moin Enhancing999, only as question as question. I looked at Commons:Report UncategorizedCategories with infobox and see, that many there is not connected to other Wiki or Wikidata, is that right in this way? When you connect more, its easier to fill the maintain-categories from the Infobox and we can fix more!? Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- None of those are connected to a Wikidata.
- They are a selection of Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no item where the category isn't a subcategory of any other. In other words, it's a category from Special:UncategorizedCategories where somebody added an empty infobox.
- If you connected it to Wikidata, in the next update it will disappear.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC) - BTW, the categories on this report shouldn't be affected by the problem M2k~dewiki reported. I purge the categories when I update the lists.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- @M2k~dewiki: Returning to your original question ... I've set pi bot looking through subcats of those categories, but excluding '[Men/Women] of Germany by name' as those categories are huge. Let's see if that finds more categories to add the infobox to, or if the changes above have already fixed them. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- @M2k~dewiki: if you have a few samples that don't have infoboxes yet, that could help. [11] did get added just today (by query2).
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- @M2k~dewiki: if you have a few samples that don't have infoboxes yet, that could help. [11] did get added just today (by query2).
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Morro Bay 2015 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument to Mario Cermenati, Wikimania 2016, MP 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At São Paulo, Brazil 2019 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Swindon Steam Railway Museum 2024 255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paróquia São Sebastião, Cachoeira Paulista 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brazilian Decimetric Array 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
_2018_038.jpg){kind=link}
And also:
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 039.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 040.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 041.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 042.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 043.jpg
_2018_039.jpg){kind=link}
_2018_040.jpg){kind=link}
_2018_041.jpg){kind=link}
_2018_042.jpg){kind=link}
_2018_043.jpg){kind=link}
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument to Mario Cermenati, Wikimania 2016, MP 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 064 - Broken Chair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Long Island 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|