User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 15 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 06:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 06:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Shougissime 19:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 11:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 20:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, description was missing (copied it from the caption now). --Plozessor 04:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 13:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 15:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 13:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 18:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 17:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, filename could be more descriptive. --Plozessor 04:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, filename could be more descriptive. --Plozessor 04:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zero-Edit for a Category

Moin Moin Mike, greeting from Germany ;) Hope you are doing well? Could you zero-edit (purge) all the cateroies of Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no instance of? I worked a bit. Next will be the given names ;) King regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 14:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Crazy1880: Running. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moin, I had an issue in my system, what is fixed now. Is this job done or still running? Or could you re-run it? Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Crazy1880: It's up to categories starting 'Images'. This is not a quick (nor cheap on the server side) task. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, filename could be more descriptive. --Plozessor 04:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, filename could be more descriptive. --Plozessor 04:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Some chroma aberration on the right. ReneeWrites 17:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tweaked CA, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Support It does, thank you :) ReneeWrites 18:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 19:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 12:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southport Pier Tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Two dustspots above the left part of the tram. Otherwise good --MB-one 11:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, dust spots removed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 06:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At American Museum of Natural History 2024 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Oppose Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 21:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At American Museum of Natural History 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment PC is needed, not centered. There are also some blownout highlights. --Sebring12Hrs 21:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, have tried to improve the centering/perspective, but this is deliberately looking upwards. Have tried to minimise the blown highlights. Better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good, thanks. --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Owing to technical limitations or a fault condition, PDF display is currently unreliable. Please upload an alternative format for multi-page doucments like Djvu. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: That doesn't work well for presentations... Is there a phab ticket for this issue? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There may be some related tickets at- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T306409 ; https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T297942 may be related, but I'm not finding a Phab ticket about the current PDF display outage on Commons, specfically . I also noticed this issue at Wikisource as well, with page scan images failing to load on PDF files, but not for Djvu. Was there some kind of image cache/load blancer for preview thumbnails, that might be being more 'assertive' in purging unused preview thumbnails? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ShakespeareFan00: Could you post it on phabricator, and I can try to ping some people about it? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T376534. I'll add this file to a list on the ticket.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but the filename would be better.--Tournasol7 06:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would like to see this composition with better light circumstances --Michielverbeek 06:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but the filename would be better.--Tournasol7 06:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but the filename would be better.--Tournasol7 06:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Phyrexian 10:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UFCG, Sousa 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GiovanniPen 09:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Елена Нечипоренко 12:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 14:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Peulle 07:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tanvir Rahat 05:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you add a cat of the station where you took File:At Tokyo 2024 270.jpg? Thank you--Tmv (talk) 14:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tmv: Done, thanks for the prod. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brazilian Decimetric Array 2017 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --6uy7t44t 15:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brazilian Decimetric Array 2017 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 08:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 07:33, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 07:33, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Great colors and composition. ReneeWrites 07:33, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes missing (2024-10)

To revisit User_talk:Mike_Peel/Archive_21#Infoboxes (from 2024-09), as I noticed that "query 2" is ever so popular (Special:Contributions/Pi_bot), maybe it's possible to improve it further by using Wikimedia Superset to find sitelinks to Commons at Wikidata, but unknown to Commons (at quarry). We would just need to find somebody with the right skills and access.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 08:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't heard of that system, but am always happy to point Pi bot towards lists of categories to check... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems it could combine data from different wikis, which Quarry no longer can.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 05:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not using Quarry, but am running queries directly on Toolforge, see wikitech:Help:Toolforge/Database, in case that helps. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Quarry is just a different interface to the same database. Yours is more convenient, but requires to query through code hosted on toolserver.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 07:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but superset also seems to be hosted there, so in principle anything that can be done with that, should also be possible with separate code? E.g., if it's worth running two queries, then comparing the results to look for matches/differences with some python code, that's easily doable. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially one would need to check all outgoing links from Wikidata to Commons and then compare it to the known items at Commons.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 08:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds possible, perhaps once a month since it's probably not too efficient. I can get lists of all uses of the Wikidata Infobox fairly easily, the 'all outgoing links' part would be the tricky bit. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One could argue that Wikidata should have some process to ensure this.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 21:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
object not centered - fixable? --Grunpfnul 14:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, cropped to centre it, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 17:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunham Massey 2015 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunham Massey 2015 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 21:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 90 Nassau Street, Princeton New Jersey 2024 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunham Massey 2015 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunham Massey 2015 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 17:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Grunpfnul 13:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 20:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunham Massey 2015 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:48, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Composition a bit noisy, but a QI for me --Michielverbeek 04:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Osterley House 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Osterley House 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paraty 2023 361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
image tilts to the left side - fixable? --Grunpfnul 18:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunham Massey 2015 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 18:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angel of the North 2016 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At USP 2018 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! California Highway One 2015 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Borderline sharpness, but I think it's acceptable for QI given this in a low light situation. --Benjism89 17:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chicago 2024 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Looks good to me. --JiriMatejicek 15:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
haze in the upper part --Grunpfnul 18:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I tried removing it some more, but it didn't work so well, so I've cropped it. How does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Sharpness isn't so good here. --Sebring12Hrs 12:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, not much I can do here sorry, it was quite dark and sharpening more will bring up the noise... Thanks. Mike Peel 16:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Sharpness and noise are acceptable here IMO. --Benjism89 13:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Osterley House 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Osterley House 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

https://www.kunst-werke.ch/rolf/html_rolf/seite_1.html RolfMüller100 (talk) 20:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

https://www.kunst-werke.ch/rolf/html_rolf/seite_1.html RolfMüller100 (talk) 20:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die Person auf Platz 3 heisst Baumann RolfMüller100 (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[https://www.kunst-werke.ch/rolf/html_rolf/seite_1.html RolfMüller100 (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 470 - Tram at Ponts de l'Île.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality of a difficult to photograph subject. --Ptrump16 15:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Shugborough 2024 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Buidhe 04:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Low level of details, especially on the sculpture --ArildV 10:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Acceptable to me. --Sebring12Hrs 17:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peyton Hall At Princeton University 2024 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:At London 2024 305.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sam Walton (talk) 22:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 19:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Buidhe 03:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 19:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park, Macclesfield 2018 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please add geo-location --Michielverbeek 07:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 10:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, reworked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, filename should be more specific though. --Plozessor 04:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 14:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 19:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A narrower framing would be better I think, cropping out the signs at the bottom left and a large part of this diagonal object. --Benjism89 19:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. Cropped as suggested, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok now --Benjism89 09:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A little noise reduction would be useful IMO. --Benjism89 13:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, I've increased the noise reduction, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better now. --Benjism89 09:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 19:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good. Filename should be more specific. --Plozessor 04:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 314 - Woodland Kyoto QR Train.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good enough. --Rbrechko 14:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 15:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:45, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 13:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 16:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 20:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 20:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Chroma on the right. ReneeWrites 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does, thank you :)  Support Good quality ReneeWrites 19:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Slight chroma on the chimneys on the left and right, otherwise good. ReneeWrites 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality ReneeWrites 19:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Imo it needs two (left and right) serious crops. The sun reflection needs to be removed and at the left I would remove the work under construction. In this case a portrait composition might have been better than landescape. The Hall and the Church are the two main objects, all other things don't add anything to the composition --Michielverbeek 07:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support The reflection of the sun, in my opinion, adds expressiveness, continuing the line set by the lighting of the Albert Hall roof. And the construction site is not a critical problem, if you crop it out, then many other interesting and relevant details in the frame will disappear along with it. So good quality, I think. --Vsatinet 18:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:At Tallinn 2024 115.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 10:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Busy compo. --Sebring12Hrs 09:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, how might I make it less busy while still showing the controls/track/context? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, depicts train controls well. --Tagooty 08:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would remove the bird near the right crop --Michielverbeek 09:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building in San Francisco 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 331 - Rhône River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Underexposed and needs better file name. --Plozessor 07:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, brightened and renamed, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, a bit blurry and lacking details at the side, but IMO ok now. --Plozessor 14:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --6uy7t44t 14:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --6uy7t44t 14:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 10:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 09:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 12:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is some cw tilt --Poco a poco 09:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 22:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 316 - Hello Kitty Haruka at Kyoto Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment File name could more precise. Right crop isn't very good. The bottom crop is disturbing. --Sebring12Hrs 00:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. File renamed. Could you be more precise about the right and bottom crop issues? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A small part of the front of the train is cut off. Is there a chance to fix that? --ArildV 08:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've managed to restore a bit of the bottom, but that's now the edge of the sensor. Thanks. Mike Peel 22:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Imo QI. --ArildV 12:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Kallerna 07:42, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA is on the left --Nikride 08:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good spot, CAs fixed, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qu8ality --Michielverbeek 07:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 10:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 09:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 07:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 07:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 17:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 18:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AVDLCZ 18:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AVDLCZ 18:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 18:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]