User talk:Mdd

Niet bailey- maar noodbrug (teruggeplaatst)

Hoi Mdd, je hebt plaatjes geüpload van een brug https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_nieuwe_Baileybrug_over_de_Maas_in_aanbouw,_1945.jpg. Dit was geen baileybrug maar een aparte noodspoorbrug. Ik heb het artikel Baileybrug Venlo geüpdate en de plaatjes weggehaald. Groetjes, Konijnewolf (talk) 14:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toevoegingː het lijkt dat je het plaatje van het Venloos Archief hebt. Tja helaas, dat archief is een ramp want het barst van de fouten. Helaas haalde Peter Keijsers ook veel foute info van die site. Groetjes Konijnewolf (talk) 15:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Berichten verwijderen

Hallo, als je berichten gewoon maar verwijdert beschouw ik je als onserieuze wikipediaan. Konijnewolf (talk) 02:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In het archiefboxje hiernaast staat voor zover ik kan zien de complete overlegpagina, die tegelijkertijd met jouw opmerking netjes verplaatst werd naar de archiefpagina 2024. Overigens zou het fijn zijn als archivering van overlegpagina's altijd standaard en automatisch gebeurt. Vysotsky (talk) 08:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, de hele pagina was ineens weg dus ik vond het vreemd. Konijnewolf (talk) 14:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Het gearchiveerde bericht is hierboven teruggeplaatst. Het betreft een upload van 2 nov 2023, zie hier. Op 13-14 december 2023 is de beschrijving van deze file aangepast, zie hier, dat dit geen Baileybrug maar een noodbrug betrof. Dit had ik kennelijk gemist en daarvoor m'n dank.

In mijn perceptie is het Venloos Archief een prachtige bron van informatie, en verdiend alle respect. Zoals overal is de informatie niet-volledig en behoeft aanvullingen en correcties. Wat ik van het eigen gepubliceerde werk van Peter Keijsers heb gelezen is, dat het behoorlijk aardig wegleest en inspireert. Op Wikipedia heeft hij eigen handig een duizendtal onderwerpen rond Venlo opgezet. Ook hier geldt dat dit zoals overal niet-volledig is en aanvullingen en correcties behoeft. -- Mdd (talk) 13:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Als je bij het Venloos Archief zoekt op "bailey" krijg je nog steeds 'tig verkeerde foto's te zien. Ik heb al honderden correcties gestuurd, en dat is nog een heel gehannes ook. Binnenkort ga ik daar eens op bezoek.
Wat Peter betreft; ik ken hem, voornamelijk van de frietkraam waar we allebei kwamen. In het echt een prima kerel. Online, bijvoorbeeld hier, lag ik ontelbare malen met hem in de clinch. Konijnewolf (talk) 14:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dit is dezelfde brug

Mdd, je bent abuis; dit zijn twee foto's van dezelfde brugː [[1]] en [[2]] Bij de tweede foto heb je in de beschrijving gezet dat het een andere brug is maar het is dezelfde.

Verander jij het of verander ik het? Groetjes Konijnewolf (talk) 20:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Er is net een screenshot gemaakt van de categorie (zie afbeelding), waar de twee nu genoemde afbeeldingen links en rechts in dezelfde categorie zitten sinds een maand of vier. Beide zijn als dezelfde brug herkend en nu als Noordelijke Pontonbrug (Venlo) benoemd. -- Mdd (talk) 21:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Klopt maar in de beschrijving staat dat hij hoger en stijver is. Maar volgens mij is het gewoon dezelfde brug. Hoger en stijver is gezichtsbedrog. Konijnewolf (talk) 21:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Venlo; Zuidelijke Pontonbrug

We moeten het even hebben over deze [3] en deze [4] pontonbruggen. De eerste brug is zuid van Nedinsco (de fabrieksflat) en verbindt de Blerickse oever met de Venlose Hamelstraat. De tweede is noord van Nedinsco en verbindt de Blerickse Victor de Stuersstraat met de Venlose Molensingel. Het zijn dus twee verschillende bruggen. Waarschijnlijk is de eerste brug, die een stuk kleiner is dan de tweede brug (dat is te zien op een luchtfoto die ik heb), de brug die een dag na de bevrijding is aangelegd. De andere brug met Montgomery is van later datum - denk ik. De bruggen zitten nu in één categorie als ware het dezelfde brug. Hoe lossen we dat op? Groeten, Konijnewolf (talk) 14:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misschien is het beter een categorie te maken "Venlo bridges playing a role during and after World War 2". Dit is mijn lijstjeː

1. Maasbrug 1865

2. Pommernbrücke (houten paalbrug) Duits 1940

3. Pontonbrug zuid klein geallieerden 1945

4. Pontonbrug zuid groot geallieerden 1945

5. Pontonbrug noord geallieerden 1945

6. Houten paalbrug geallieerden 1945

7. Noodspoorbrug 1946

8. Baileybrug 1947

9. Maasbrug (verkeer) 1957

10. Spoorbrug 1964 Konijnewolf (talk) 14:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De volgende foto (een uitsnede), gecombineerd met aanvullende data van de Britse Imperial War Museums (zie hier), leert ons dat beide bruggen vrijwel gelijktijdig gebouwd zijn. Het eerste bezoek van Veldmaarschalk Montgomery was namelijk op 8 maart 1945, en op 17 maart 1945 (zie hier) was hij nog een keer terug voor een laatste inspectie.

De omschrijving van de Category:Zuidelijke Pontonbrug (Venlo) is nu aangepast dat het beide pontonbruggen omvat. Indien er substantieel meer afbeeldingen en/of andere media beschikbaar komen, dan kan men wellicht overwegen een aanvullende aparte categorie aan te maken. -- 23:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Tomasso_Geraci

Category:Tomasso_Geraci has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Tanja Creifelds (talk) 05:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hernoemingen

Beste Mdd, verzoeken tot hernoeming die je zelf onlangs hebt geüpload (tot 2-3 dagen), gaan het liefst onder Criterion 1, i.p.v. Criterion 3. Dit is makkelijker voor de filemover en bovendien het juiste criterium. Ook kan een filemover een redirect weglaten bij zeer recente bestanden, hoewel dat de keuze en verantwoordelijkheid bij de filemover (hernoemer) ligt. Als een bestand nog niet ergens gebruikt wordt, is die mogelijkheid daar. Kijk maar wat je hiermee doet, in ieder geval weet je nu dat het handiger is voor de filemover en dat de kans bestaat dat (onnodige) redirects niet worden gemaakt. Vriendelijke groet en jij ook bedankt voor je bijdragen hier (zoals ik weleens lees van jou, richting mij), - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Het inpakken van glaswerk in het Museum Boijmans, 1939.jpg

File:Het inpakken van glaswerk in het Museum Boijmans, 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portret van Caroline Gevers van Ateliers '90, 1991.jpg

File:Portret van Caroline Gevers van Ateliers '90, 1991.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Multichill (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. F.W.T. Hunger overhandigt Prins Bernhard een litho als eerste prijs in de dressuurwedstrijd Prix Saint Georges.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Dr. F.W.T. Hunger overhandigt Prins Bernhard een litho als eerste prijs in de dressuurwedstrijd Prix Saint Georges.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, ツィプカ・ウエルド (talk) 06:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noodkreet of iets anders?

@Mdd: had je deze toevoeging gezien? Ik haal dit weg omwille van privacy maar het zou toch écht helemaal moeten verdwijnen, denk je niet? Cheers. Lotje (talk) 16:04, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: , bedankt voor dit bericht en je correctie. Ik heb dat wellicht over het hoofd gezien vier maanden terug, toen ik daar die categorie toevoegde. Mvg. -- Mdd (talk) 17:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photograpgs_by_Isidor_Arras_Ochse

Category:Photograpgs_by_Isidor_Arras_Ochse has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

XVRWiki (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Payroll

Payroll has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--125.230.82.211 22:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

waarom category verwijderd?

hi Mdd, waarom heb je bij File:Twee Embryo's van Roel Bendijk.jpg de Category:Hoogstraat (Nieuwpoort) verwijderd? Groet Agaath (talk) 20:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi Mdd dank voor je aanvulling van de category groet--Agaath (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1950s Vlissingen. Kleine Markt - Walstraat.jpg

File:1950s Vlissingen. Kleine Markt - Walstraat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Robotje (talk) 06:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Valkebergs laesplenkske, 1984.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Valkebergs laesplenkske, 1984.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Vera ^(talk) 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Station_Bergweg

Station Bergweg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ErickAgain 12:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Category:Agricultural_charts

Agricultural charts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Faculty of Koninklijke Akademie van Beeldende Kunsten : wat is dat?

Hoi MDD, Hier plaatste U iemand in cat:Faculty of Koninklijke Akademie van Beeldende Kunsten (Amsterdam). Maar waarvoor dient deze categorie, wat betekent het? Dat is de hoofdvraag. Daarnaast kan ik geen bron ontdekken voor Madou als behorend tot deze cat. Wie zouden daar allemaal toe behoren en op welke grond? Waar zijn die data te vinden? Ik zie nu dat het wellicht gaat om een voorafgaand instituut? Kan de relatie met parent met wiki data info of een kort intro tekstje erbij uitgelegd worden? Bedankt. Groet Peli (talk) 14:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thx @Pelikana: , faculty is medewerker of medewerkers van een hogere opleiding, die in (tijdelijke) dienst zijn. In dit geval betreft het de Tekenacademie (Den Haag 1682-), voorloper van KABK Den Haag. In dit geval was wellicht RKD de gebruikte bron. Jean-Baptiste Madou leefde een tijd(je) in Scheveningen en had een drietal leerlingen. Deze leerlingen hadden de Tekenacademie in Den Haag gevolgd, en hadden daar les van hem gehad. Nu is dit soort vroege informatie niet volledig op de RKD, en was er 1.5 jaar terug wellicht nog wat meer data bij de RKD. Het was dus niet Amsterdam, maar Den Haag waar hij les gaf. -- Mdd (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nu lijkt je ook te vragen naar de betekenis van de Categorie:Faculty of...!? Deze categorie geeft het docentencorps weer bij universiteiten en kunstacademies etc. Dat is telkens een interessante verzameling, want dat zijn de docenten/leermeesters van de opvolgende generatie. -- Mdd (talk) 17:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi nog bedankt voor de uitleg en het kan inderdaad interessante lijsten opleveren.Peli (talk) 10:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Design drawings

Hoi MDD. Er is enige discussie over Design drawings (by collection, hier: RMA). Ik zag dat je in 2015 deze term gebruikte ivm Maria van Jessekerk (Delft) daarom vraag ik nu of je een mening wilt geven hier. Het gaat over een van de ca. 20 first level subcategorieën van tekeningen in het RMA, die zelf weer een koepel is voor diverse subcats van met name boekbandontwerpen, getekende illustratie ontwerpen etc.Peli (talk) 10:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thx @Pelikana: , de opzet en het belang van de categorie zelf lijkt nu duidelijk onderkent en erkent. Er is nu een eerste oplossing doorgevoerd in de vorm van een nadere beschrijving van de categorie. Verder kan de Category:Architectural designs in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam nader gespecificeerd worden tot "Category:Architectural designs drawings in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam". Mvg -- Mdd (talk) 08:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Village pump

Hi, There is currently a discussion on Village pump which concerns you. Please respond there. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 Verblijfsplek Diergaarde Blijdorp (2007) Marcelle van Bemmel.jpg

File:2024 Verblijfsplek Diergaarde Blijdorp (2007) Marcelle van Bemmel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 09:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs_by_Donald_Trung_in_Rotterdam

Photographs by Donald Trung in Rotterdam has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ReneeWrites (talk) 14:56, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Categories_initiated_by_User:Mdd

Categories initiated by User:Mdd has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 17:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mdd

Contents

Niet bailey- maar noodbrug (teruggeplaatst)

Berichten verwijderen

Dit is dezelfde brug

Venlo; Zuidelijke Pontonbrug

Category:Tomasso_Geraci

Hernoemingen

File:Het inpakken van glaswerk in het Museum Boijmans, 1939.jpg

File:Portret van Caroline Gevers van Ateliers '90, 1991.jpg

File:Dr. F.W.T. Hunger overhandigt Prins Bernhard een litho als eerste prijs in de dressuurwedstrijd Prix Saint Georges.jpg

Noodkreet of iets anders?

Category:Photograpgs_by_Isidor_Arras_Ochse

Category:Payroll

waarom category verwijderd?

File:1950s Vlissingen. Kleine Markt - Walstraat.jpg

File tagging File:Valkebergs laesplenkske, 1984.jpg

Category:Station_Bergweg

Category:Agricultural_charts

Faculty of Koninklijke Akademie van Beeldende Kunsten : wat is dat?

Design drawings

Discussion on Village pump

File:2024 Verblijfsplek Diergaarde Blijdorp (2007) Marcelle van Bemmel.jpg

Category:Photographs_by_Donald_Trung_in_Rotterdam

Category:Categories_initiated_by_User:Mdd

Navigation menu

User talk:Mdd

Niet bailey- maar noodbrug (teruggeplaatst)

Berichten verwijderen

Dit is dezelfde brug

Venlo; Zuidelijke Pontonbrug

Hernoemingen

Noodkreet of iets anders?

waarom category verwijderd?

File tagging File:Valkebergs laesplenkske, 1984.jpg

Faculty of Koninklijke Akademie van Beeldende Kunsten : wat is dat?

Design drawings

Discussion on Village pump

Navigation menu

Search